Second
Temple
Synagogue
Literary
Archive
Second Temple
Synagogue
FAQs
Discussion
Board
Image Gallery
Gamla
Capernaum
Masada
Herodium
Qumran
Jerusalem
Delos
Ostia
Egypt
Cyrenaica
The Bosporus
Credits
Book Excerpt
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Select Bibliography
About the Author
Curriculum Vitae
NT 8326
Reli
3326
AST
6V90
Biblical
Archaeology
Archaeology
and Ancient
Civilizations
The Revelation
to John Across
the Ages
NT Studies
Resources
The Bible
Extra-Canonical
Judaica
Church Fathers
Historical
Papyrology
Language
Archaeology
Other Sites
Family Corner
Sign the Guestbook
Browse the
Guestbook
Search this Site |
A very short time after this,
certain young men of Dora, who set a higher value on audacity than on holiness and were by
nature recklessly bold, brought an image of Caesar into the synagogue of the Jews and set
it up. This provoked Agrippa exceedingly, for it was tantamount to an overthrow of
the laws of his fathers. Without delay he went to see Publius Petronius, the governor of
Syria, and denounced the people of Dora (Josephus, Ant. 19.300301).
|
Publius Petronius, legate of Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus
Germanicus, to the leading men of Dora speaks: Inasmuch as certain of you have had such
mad audacity, notwithstanding the issuance of an edict of Claudius Caesar Augustus
Germanicus pertaining to the permission granted the Jews to observe the customs of their
fathers, not to obey this edict, but to do the very reverse, in that
you have prevented the Jews from having a synagogue by transferring to it an image of
Caesar, you have thereby sinned not only against the law of the Jews, but also against the
emperor, whose image was better placed in his own shrine than in that of another,
especially in the synagogue; for by natural law each must be lord over his own
place, in accordance with Caesars decree (Publius Petronius ap. Josephus, Ant.
19.303305).
|
In these passages, Josephus records an incident from c. 41 CE when the people of Dora
(northern coast of Palestine) desecrated a synagogue by placing an image of Caesar inside.
Both Josephus' remark about the Doran's lack of regard for "holiness" and
Petronius' comparison of the synagogue to a "shrine" (naos) suggest the
sacred nature of the edifice.
Caesar Augustus, Pontifex Maximus with tribunician
power, decrees as follows. Since the Jewish nation has been found well disposed to the
Roman people not only at the present time but also in the time past, and especially in the
time of my father the emperor Caesar, as has their high priest Hyrcanus, it has been
decided by me and my council under oath, with the consent of the Roman people, that the
Jews may follow their own customs in accordance with the law of their fathers, just as
they followed them in the time of Hyrcanus, high priest of the Most High God, and that
their sacred monies shall be inviolable and may be sent up to Jerusalem and delivered to
the treasurers in Jerusalem, and that they need not give bond (to appear in court) on the
Sabbath or on the day of preparation for it (Sabbath Eve) after the ninth hour. And if anyone is caught stealing their sacred books or their sacred monies
from a synagogue or an ark (of the Law) [or a banquet hall], he shall be regarded
as sacrilegious, and his property shall be confiscated to the public treasury of the
Romans (Augustus ap. Josephus, Ant. 16.162165).
|
This decree of Augustus was issued around the year 2 CE and applied to Jewish
communities within the province of Asia (western Turkey). Under the decree, any thief of
sacred monies from the synagogues and their annexes was to be condemned as
"sacriligious"--or more literally, as a "temple robber" (hierosylon).
The charge and the punishment are equivilent to those issued against robbers of monies
from pagan temples during this period.
Now the Jews though naturally well-disposed for peace could not be
expected to remain quiet whatever happened, not only because with all men the
determination to fight for their institutions outweighs even the danger to life, but also because they are the only people under the sun who by losing their
synagogues were losing also what they would have valued as worth dying many thousand
deaths, namely, their means of showing reverence to their benefactors, since they no
longer had the sacred precincts [hieroi periboloi] where they could set forth their
thankfulness (Philo, Flacc. 48).
|
Here, Philo states that the synagogues form "sacred precincts" for the Jews.
Outside of Jewish usage, this designation normally represents the sacred area surrounding
a temple shrine. |