Second
Temple
Synagogue
Literary
Archive
Second Temple
Synagogue
FAQs
Discussion
Board
Image Gallery
Gamla
Capernaum
Masada
Herodium
Qumran
Jerusalem
Delos
Ostia
Egypt
Cyrenaica
The Bosporus
Credits
Book Excerpt
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Select Bibliography
About the Author
Curriculum Vitae
NT 8326
Reli
3326
AST
6V90
Biblical
Archaeology
Archaeology
and Ancient
Civilizations
The Revelation
to John Across
the Ages
NT Studies
Resources
The Bible
Extra-Canonical
Judaica
Church Fathers
Historical
Papyrology
Language
Archaeology
Other Sites
Family Corner
Sign the Guestbook
Browse the
Guestbook
Search this Site |
"While I have a great abundance of evidence to show the
wishes of your great-grandfather Augustus I will content myself with two examples. The
first is a letter which he sent to the governors of the provinces in Asia, as he had
learnt that the sacred first-fruits were treated with disrespect. He
ordered that the Jews alone should be permitted by them to assemble in synagogues. These
gatherings, he said, were not based on drunkenness and carousing to promote conspiracy and
so to do grave injury to the cause of peace, but were schools of temperance and justice
where men while practising virtue subscribed the annual first-fruits to pay for the
sacrifices which they offer and commissioned sacred envoys to take them to the temple in
Jerusalem. Then he commanded that no one should hinder the Jews from meeting or
subscribing or sending envoys to Jerusalem according to their ancestral practice. For
these were certainly the substance if not the actual words of his instructions"
(Agrippa I [?] ap. Philo, Legat. 311313).
|
Here, King Agrippa I (or Philo writing in his name) urges Caligula to reconsider his
plan to place a statue of Zeus inside the Jerusalem Temple (40 CE). Interestingly, he
appeals to Augustus' earlier decree regarding the Asian synagogues, wherein the
emperor allowed their establishment and their collection of sacred monies. Josephus
records the actual decree.
[Augustus] was aware that the great section of Rome on the
other side of the Tiber is occupied and inhabited by Jews, most of whom were Roman
citizens emancipated. For having been brought as captives to Italy they were liberated by
their owners and were not forced to violate any of their native institutions. He knew therefore that they have synagogues and meet together in
them, particularly on the sacred sabbaths when they receive as a body a training in their
ancestral philosophy.
He knew too that they collect money for sacred purposes from
their first-fruits and send them to Jerusalem by persons who would offer the sacrifices.
Yet nevertheless he neither ejected them from Rome nor deprived them of their Roman
citizenship because they were careful to preserve their Jewish citizenship also, nor took
any violent measures against the synagogues, nor prevented them from meeting to receive
instructions in the laws, nor opposed their offerings of the first-fruits.
Indeed so religiously did he respect our interests that supported by wellnigh his
whole household he adorned our temple through the costliness of his dedications, and
ordered that for all time continuous sacrifices of whole burnt offerings should be carried
out every day at his own expense as a tribute to the most high God (Philo, Legat.
155157).
|
Philo writes here of how the synagogues in Rome itself collected sacred monies and sent
envoys to Jerusalem to offer sacrifices on behalf of the local congregations.
The revenues of the temple are derived not only from landed estates but also from
other and far greater sources which time will never destroy. For as long as the human race
endures, and it will endure for ever, the revenues of the temple also will remain secure
co-eternal with the whole universe. For it is ordained that everyone, beginning at his
twentieth year should make an annual contribution of first-fruits . . .
As the nation is very populous, the offerings of first-fruits are naturally
exceedingly abundant. In fact, practically in every city there are
banking places for the holy money where people regularly come and give their offerings.
And at stated times there are appointed to carry the sacred tribute envoys selected on
their merits, from every city those of the highest repute, under whose conduct the
hope of each and all will travel safely (Philo, Spec. 1.7678).
|
Given the above references, Philo's mention of "banking
places" where the Jewish sacred monies were collected is probably an allusion to
diaspora synagogues serving in this capacity.
Now it displeases me that such statutes should be made against our friends and
allies [the Jews] and that they should be forbidden to live in accordance with their
customs and to contribute money to common meals and sacred rites, for this they are not
forbidden to do even in Rome. For example, Gaius Caesar, our
consular praetor, by edict forbade religious societies to assemble in the city, but these
people alone he did not forbid to do so or to collect contributions of money or to hold
common meals. Similarly do I forbid other religious societies but permit these
people alone to assemble and feast in accordance with their native customs and ordinances.
(Julius Caesar, ap. Josephus, Ant. 14.213216).
|
Julius Caesar issued this decree c. 49 BCE, chastising the people
of Delos for their mistreatment of the Jews on that Greek island. In the letter, he
alludes to the permission given the Jews in Rome to meet and collect monies during his
praetorship. In view of Philo's testimony above, it is likely that the
monies primarily constituted donations to the Jerusalem Temple. |