Synagogues as Law Courts

Back Home Up Next

Second Temple
Synagogue

Literary
Archive


Second Temple
Synagogue
FAQs

Discussion
Board

Image Gallery

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Gamla
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Capernaum
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Masada
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Herodium
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Qumran
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Jerusalem
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Delos
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Ostia
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Egypt

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Cyrenaica
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)The Bosporus
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Credits

Book Excerpt

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Abstract
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Acknowledgements
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Introduction
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Select Bibliography

About the Author

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Curriculum Vitae
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)NT 8326
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Reli 3326
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)AST 6V90
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Biblical
trans.GIF (821 bytes)Archaeology

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Archaeology
trans.GIF (821 bytes)and Ancient
trans.GIF (821 bytes)Civilizations

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)The Revelation
trans.GIF (821 bytes)to John Across
trans.GIF (821 bytes)the Ages

NT StudiesUpdated!
Resources

greenbal.gif (109 bytes)The Bible
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Extra-Canonical
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Judaica
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Church Fathers
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Historical
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Papyrology
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Language
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Archaeology
greenbal.gif (109 bytes)Other Sites

Family Corner

Sign the Guestbook

Browse the
Guestbook

Search this Site

 
Lucius Antionius, son of Marcus, proquaestor and propraetor, to the magistrates, council and people of Sardis, greeting. Jewish citizens of ours have come to me and pointed out that from the earliest times they have had an association of their own in accordance with their native laws and a place of their own, in which they decide their own affairs and controversies with one another; and upon their request that it be permitted them to do these things, I decided that they might be maintained, and permitted them so to do (Lucius Antionius, ap. Josephus, Ant. 14.235).

This decree, which dates to 49 BCE, recognizes that the Jews of Sardis (modern Turkey) possessed a "place" (topos) of their own in which they settled legal disputes amongst themselves. Most synagogue scholars agree that the reference is to a synagogue, whose construction was previously authorized by the people of Sardis.

 

I decided to visit Tiberias early on the morrow. Arriving there about the first hour next day, I found the people already assembling in the synagogue, although they had no idea why they were being convened. Seriously perturbed by my unexpected appearance, Jonathan and his party conceived the idea of spreading a report that some Roman cavalry had been descried on the frontier, at a place called Homonoia, at a distance of thirty furlongs from the city. A fictitious message arriving to this effect, Jonathan exhorted me not to remain idle while their country was being plundered by the enemy. Their object in this was to get me away on the pretext of an urgent call for my services, and to alienate the city from me in my absence.
Though well aware of their design, I complied, to avoid giving the Tiberians ground for thinking me careless of their safety. I set out, accordingly, but discovering, on reaching the spot, no trace of an enemy, I returned post haste and found the whole of the council and populace in conclave, and Jonathan and his associates making a violent tirade against me, as one who lived in luxury and neglected to alleviate their share of the burden of the war. In support of these assertions they produced four letters purporting to have been addressed to them by persons on the Galilee frontier, imploring them to come to their aid, as a Roman force of cavalry and infantry was intending in three days' time to ravage their territory, with entreaties to hasten to their relief and not to abandon them to their fate.
On hearing these statements, which they believed to be authentic, the Tiberians began loudly to denounce me for sitting there when I ought to have gone to the assistance of their countrymen. Fully alive to Jonathan's designs, I replied that I was quite ready to act on their instructions, and promised to start without delay for the scene of action. At the same time I advised them, as the letters indicated an impending Roman attack on four points, to form their troops into five divisions and to put these severally under the command of Jonathan and his companions. It became brave men (I urged) to give not merely advice but practical assistance by assuming the lead in an emergency; and it was impossible for me to take command of more than a single division. My suggestion was warmly endorsed by the people, who now put compulsion on my opponents also to take the field. The failure of their scheme through this counter-manoeuvre on my part caused them no little embarrassment (Josephus, Vita 279-289).

Josephus here describes a meeting inside a synagogue in Tiberias (Galilee) during the Jewish War in which his political opponents convened the city council (boulê) and popular assembly (dêmos) in an attempt to convince them to rebel against Josephus' command. The first-hand account reveals how colorful such deliberative proceedings could be. It also underscores the point that the lines between the religious and political functions of the synagogue were quite blurred.

 

But the lawless men turned away, murmuring threats among themselves and plotting to put [Susanna] to death. They came to the synagogue of the city where they sojourned, and all the Israelites who were there assembled (Sus 28, OG; translation, John J. Collins, Daniel).

This passage from the Old Greek version of Susanna contains one of the earliest literary references to a synagogue (c. 100 BCE). In the tale, Susanna is placed on trial inside the local synagogue for supposed promiscuous behavior. The young hero Daniel comes forward to prove the deceit of her accusers. In the later Theodotus version of this story, the trial takes place at the scene of the alleged crime.

 

Agrippa to the magistrates, council and people of Ephesus, greeting. It is my will that the care and custody of the sacred monies belonging to the account of the temple in Jerusalem shall be given to the Jews in Asia in accordance with their ancestral customs. And if any men steal the sacred monies of the Jews and take refuge in places of asylum, it is my will that they be dragged away from them and turned over to the Jews under the same law by which temple-robbers are dragged away from asylum. I have also written to the praetor Silanus that no one shall compel the Jews to give bond to appear in court on the Sabbath (Marcus Agrippa ap. Josephus, Ant. 16.167).

This decree, written near the turn of the era by Marcus Agrippa to the Ephesians, is significant because it orders that perpetrators caught stealing from the Jewish sacred monies were to be handed over not to the local authorities, but to the Jews themselves. This indicates that the Ephesian Jews had at least limited authority to prosecute and punish culprits. Because other passages indicate that these proceedings normally took place in the synagogues, this was probably also the case at Ephesus.

 

"As for yourselves, beware; for they will hand you over to councils; and you will be beaten in synagogues; and you will stand before governors and kings because of me, as a testimony to them" (Mark 13:9).
"Beware of them, for they will hand you over to councils and flog you in their synagogues" (Matt 10:17).
"But before all this occurs, they will arrest you and persecute you; they will hand you over to synagogues and prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors because of my name" (Luke 21:12).

Here, the Marcan passage with its Lucan and Matthaean parallels portrays the synagogues as places where criminal prosecutions and punishments were enacted.

 

Meanwhile Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any who belonged to the Way, men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem (Acts 9:1-2).
"And I [Paul] said, 'Lord, they themselves know that in every synagogue I imprisoned and beat those who believed in you'" (Acts 22:19).
"And that is what I [Paul] did in Jerusalem; with authority received from the chief priests, I not only locked up many of the saints in prison, but I also cast my vote against them when they were being condemned to death. By punishing them often in all the synagogues I tried to force them to blaspheme; and since I was so furiously enraged at them, I pursued them even to foreign cities" (Acts 26:10-11).
For I [Paul] am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God (1 Cor 15:9).
Five times I [Paul] have received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one (2 Cor 11:24).

In the first three passages, the writer of Acts depicts Paul as taking legal action against the Christians within the synagogues, a portrayal that receives at least partial confirmation from the Apostle's own writings.

The final passage suggests that Paul himself received floggings within the synagogues as a result of his extensive missionary efforts.

To Cite this page:

Donald D. Binder, "Synagogues as Law Courts."
<http://www.pohick.org/sts/law.html>
 
© Donald D. Binder, 1997-2007
All Rights Reserved

Go to the top of this document