Second
Temple
Synagogue
Literary
Archive
Second Temple
Synagogue
FAQs
Discussion
Board
Image Gallery
Gamla
Capernaum
Masada
Herodium
Qumran
Jerusalem
Delos
Ostia
Egypt
Cyrenaica
The Bosporus
Credits
Book Excerpt
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Select Bibliography
About the Author
Curriculum Vitae
NT 8326
Reli
3326
AST
6V90
Biblical
Archaeology
Archaeology
and Ancient
Civilizations
The Revelation
to John Across
the Ages
NT Studies
Resources
The Bible
Extra-Canonical
Judaica
Church Fathers
Historical
Papyrology
Language
Archaeology
Other Sites
Family Corner
Sign the Guestbook
Browse the
Guestbook
Search this Site |
Lucius Antionius, son of Marcus, proquaestor and propraetor, to the magistrates,
council and people of Sardis, greeting. Jewish citizens of ours have come to me and
pointed out that from the earliest times they have had an association of their own in
accordance with their native laws and a place of their own, in which
they decide their own affairs and controversies with one another; and upon their
request that it be permitted them to do these things, I decided that they might be
maintained, and permitted them so to do (Lucius Antionius, ap. Josephus, Ant.
14.235).
|
This decree, which dates to 49 BCE, recognizes that the Jews of Sardis (modern Turkey)
possessed a "place" (topos) of their own in which they settled legal
disputes amongst themselves. Most synagogue scholars agree that the reference is to a
synagogue, whose construction was previously authorized by
the people of Sardis.
I decided to visit Tiberias early on the morrow. Arriving
there about the first hour next day, I found the people already assembling in the
synagogue, although they had no idea why they were being convened. Seriously
perturbed by my unexpected appearance, Jonathan and his party conceived the idea of
spreading a report that some Roman cavalry had been descried on the frontier, at a place
called Homonoia, at a distance of thirty furlongs from the city. A fictitious message
arriving to this effect, Jonathan exhorted me not to remain idle while their country was
being plundered by the enemy. Their object in this was to get me away on the pretext of an
urgent call for my services, and to alienate the city from me in my absence.
Though well aware of their design, I complied, to avoid giving the Tiberians ground
for thinking me careless of their safety. I set out, accordingly, but discovering, on
reaching the spot, no trace of an enemy, I returned post haste and
found the whole of the council and populace in conclave, and Jonathan and his
associates making a violent tirade against me, as one who lived in luxury and neglected to
alleviate their share of the burden of the war. In support of these assertions they
produced four letters purporting to have been addressed to them by persons on the Galilee
frontier, imploring them to come to their aid, as a Roman force of cavalry and infantry
was intending in three days' time to ravage their territory, with entreaties to hasten to
their relief and not to abandon them to their fate.
On hearing these statements, which they believed to be authentic, the Tiberians began
loudly to denounce me for sitting there when I ought to have gone to the assistance of
their countrymen. Fully alive to Jonathan's designs, I replied that I was quite ready to
act on their instructions, and promised to start without delay for the scene of action. At
the same time I advised them, as the letters indicated an impending Roman attack on four
points, to form their troops into five divisions and to put these severally under the
command of Jonathan and his companions. It became brave men (I urged) to give not merely
advice but practical assistance by assuming the lead in an emergency; and it was
impossible for me to take command of more than a single division. My suggestion was warmly
endorsed by the people, who now put compulsion on my opponents also to take the field. The
failure of their scheme through this counter-manoeuvre on my part caused them no little
embarrassment (Josephus, Vita 279-289).
|
Josephus here describes a meeting inside a synagogue in Tiberias (Galilee) during the
Jewish War in which his political opponents convened the city council (boulê)
and popular assembly (dêmos) in an attempt to convince them to rebel against
Josephus' command. The first-hand account reveals how colorful such deliberative
proceedings could be. It also underscores the point that the lines between the religious
and political functions of the synagogue were quite blurred.
But the lawless men turned away, murmuring threats among themselves and plotting
to put [Susanna] to death. They came to the synagogue of the city where they sojourned,
and all the Israelites who were there assembled (Sus 28, OG; translation, John J. Collins,
Daniel).
|
This passage from the Old Greek version of Susanna contains one of the earliest
literary references to a synagogue (c. 100 BCE). In the tale, Susanna is placed on trial
inside the local synagogue for supposed promiscuous behavior. The young hero Daniel comes
forward to prove the deceit of her accusers. In the later Theodotus version of this story,
the trial takes place at the scene of the alleged crime.
Agrippa to the magistrates, council and people of Ephesus, greeting. It is my will
that the care and custody of the sacred monies belonging to the account of the temple in
Jerusalem shall be given to the Jews in Asia in accordance with their ancestral customs. And if any men steal the sacred monies of the Jews and take refuge in
places of asylum, it is my will that they be dragged away from them and turned over to the
Jews under the same law by which temple-robbers are dragged away from asylum. I
have also written to the praetor Silanus that no one shall compel the Jews to give bond to
appear in court on the Sabbath (Marcus Agrippa ap. Josephus, Ant. 16.167).
|
This decree, written near the turn of the era by Marcus Agrippa to the Ephesians, is
significant because it orders that perpetrators caught stealing from the Jewish sacred
monies were to be handed over not to the local authorities, but to the Jews
themselves. This indicates that the Ephesian Jews had at least limited authority to
prosecute and punish culprits. Because other passages indicate that these proceedings
normally took place in the synagogues, this was probably also the case at Ephesus.
"As for yourselves, beware; for they will hand you over to councils; and you will be beaten in synagogues; and you will stand before
governors and kings because of me, as a testimony to them" (Mark 13:9).
|
"Beware of them, for they will hand you over to
councils and flog you in their synagogues" (Matt 10:17).
|
"But before all this occurs, they will arrest you and persecute you; they will hand you over to synagogues and prisons, and you will be
brought before kings and governors because of my name" (Luke 21:12).
|
Here, the Marcan passage with its Lucan and Matthaean parallels portrays the synagogues
as places where criminal prosecutions and punishments were enacted.
Meanwhile Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the
Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the
synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any who belonged to the Way, men or women, he
might bring them bound to Jerusalem (Acts 9:1-2).
|
"And I [Paul] said, 'Lord, they themselves know that in
every synagogue I imprisoned and beat those who believed in you'" (Acts
22:19).
|
"And that is what I [Paul] did in Jerusalem; with authority received from the
chief priests, I not only locked up many of the saints in prison, but I also cast my vote
against them when they were being condemned to death. By punishing
them often in all the synagogues I tried to force them to blaspheme; and since I
was so furiously enraged at them, I pursued them even to foreign cities" (Acts
26:10-11).
|
For I [Paul] am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an
apostle, because I persecuted the church of God (1 Cor 15:9).
|
Five times I [Paul] have received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one (2 Cor
11:24).
|
In the first three passages, the writer of Acts depicts Paul as taking legal action
against the Christians within the synagogues, a portrayal that receives at least partial
confirmation from the Apostle's own writings.
The final passage suggests that Paul himself received floggings within the synagogues
as a result of his extensive missionary efforts. |